public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ittay <ittay.eyal@cornell•edu>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ittay Eyal <ittay.eyal@cornell•edu>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin-NG whitepaper.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:28:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABT1wW=xqShMGU0+eDiNyNkr-77fQ_HnyKL87C6iGL-xq8BYVw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBaxWAsEG71FTy4SrVu94BXokeozmJ80tjsNU8ERpTfFaFA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail•com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Emin Gün Sirer
> <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > while the whitepaper has all the nitty gritty details:
> >      http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02037
>
> Taking reward compensation back by fraud proofs is not enough to fix
> the problems associated with double spending (such as, everyone has to
> wait for the "real" confirmations instead of the "possibly
> double-spend" confirmations). Some of this was discussed in -wizards
> recently:
> http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-09-19.log


Fraud proof removes all the attacker's revenue. It's like the attacker
sacrifices an entire block for double spending in the current system. I
think Luke-Jr got it right at that discussion.

Best,
Ittay

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1555 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-14 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14 18:02 Emin Gün Sirer
2015-10-14 18:12 ` Bryan Bishop
2015-10-14 18:28   ` Ittay [this message]
2015-10-14 18:57     ` Matt Corallo
2015-10-15 15:09       ` Ittay
2015-10-28  2:08         ` Matt Corallo
2015-11-06 20:48           ` Ittay
2015-10-14 18:14 ` Sergio Demian Lerner
     [not found] ` <20151014182055.GC23875@mcelrath.org>
2015-10-14 18:38   ` Ittay
2015-10-14 18:39   ` Emin Gün Sirer
2015-10-14 22:21     ` odinn
2015-10-15  1:59       ` Matt Corallo
2015-10-15  8:48         ` odinn
2015-10-15 15:12           ` Ittay
2015-10-15 18:43             ` odinn
2015-10-14 20:52 ` Bob McElrath
2015-11-09 18:33 ` Emin Gün Sirer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABT1wW=xqShMGU0+eDiNyNkr-77fQ_HnyKL87C6iGL-xq8BYVw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ittay.eyal@cornell$(echo .)edu \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kanzure@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox